Letters — Issue 102

A radical thought

Here’s a radical thought for Chris Else (NZB, Autumn 2013). Perhaps a book reviewer might endeavour to say a couple of pertinent things about the book under review. If that book happens to be a major new anthology of New Zealand literature, then maybe he could give us an idea of who is in the book and what he thinks of the selections. If the anthology has a particular aim – in this case, to rescue the literature of the colonial period from its “critical eclipse” at the hands of Curnow and the cultural nationalists – then it might make sense to mention it. Instead of this, your reviewer prefers to expatiate on the judging process for the Montana Book Awards and on the merits of a recent anthology of Great Sporting Moments. That you should publish such a shoddy and definitively useless review under the heading, “The quality question”, at least argues, I hope, a sense of irony on your part.

Liam McIlvanney
Dunedin

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Letters
Search the archive
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Architecture
Art
Autobiography
Awards
Biography
Byline
Children
Comment
Contents
ebooks
Economics
Editorial
Education
Essays
Extract
Fiction
Gender
Graphic novel
Health
History
Imprints
Language
Lecture
Letters
Letters
Literature
Māori
Media
Memoir
Music
Natural History
Non-fiction
Obituaries
Opinion
Pacific
Photography
Plays
Poem
Poetry
Politics & Law
Psychology
Religion
Review
Science
Short stories
Sociology
Sport
Subscribers only
Uncategorized
War
YA Reviewers
Young adults
Recent issues: subscriber-only access

Subscribe to NZ Books to access the issues above

Search by category

See more