A response from the publishers

The basic premise of your editorial in the December 2000 issue (“Publishers behaving badly”) was quite reasonable. Publishers should indeed accept or reject submissions, or discuss a continuation of consideration with authors within three months.

Unfortunately, the editorial tends to leave the impression that it is standard for publishers not to do so, and uses a few extreme examples in a way that would lead the reader to assume this was the case.

Despite the fact that some publishers receive 500-1000 unsolicited manuscripts in a year, most are immediately acknowledged and processed promptly. Consideration often does take time, and this is for two main reasons. One is that in many houses such decisions are taken after discussion amongst many staff; and it may be a month before the title even makes it to a publishing committee for serious discussion. The second is that the decision to publish is, in effect, a major investment for a publisher, and these decisions are not taken lightly.

Regarding your examples, I would just offer the following:

  1. There will always be some examples of slothful response, but they should be placed in context.
  2. For a publisher not to catalogue a title indicates an oversight of considerable proportion, but since it would be a very costly oversight, it isn’t likely to be done for reasons of “half-heartedness”.
  3. It is rare for publishers not to pay royalties due, so the example is mischievous rather than helpful.

Suggesting the adoption of a three-month rule is helpful, though many publishers would say that they operate within that already. It is a pity that such a positive suggestion was so negatively wrapped.

 

Kevin Chapman
President
Book Publishers’ Association of New Zealand
Auckland

 

 

[The editors welcome Mr Chapman’s positive response to our proposed “three-month rule”, but they would like to point out that the examples chosen are authentic and, with one exception, by no means isolated. They were not put forward in a spirit of mischief.]

 

 

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Comment
Search the archive
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Architecture
Art
Autobiography
Awards
Biography
Byline
Children
Comment
Contents
ebooks
Economics
Editorial
Education
Essays
Extract
Fiction
Gender
Graphic novel
Health
History
Imprints
Language
Lecture
Letters
Letters
Literature
Māori
Media
Memoir
Music
Natural History
Non-fiction
Obituaries
Opinion
Pacific
Photography
Plays
Poem
Poetry
Politics & Law
Psychology
Religion
Review
Science
Short stories
Sociology
Sport
War
YA Reviewers
Young adults
Recent issues: subscriber-only access

    Subscribe to NZ Books to access the issues above

    Search by category

    See more