Letters – Issue 36

Parallel importing

Laura Kroetsch’s lucid round-up on parallel importing in your October issue was very timely. As a regular direct importer, Unity Books is pleased to be decriminalized by the new legislation, and we believe that our kind of parallel importing will not jeopardise local authors or publishers. But there’s the legislative rub. Someone else’s might. Our customers – readers or writers or both – have access to massive international media resources. If we don’t get a book quickly for them, they’ll get it themselves and, let’s face it, the “open market” is never more open than when the shopping bag is on-screen.

Globalisation is a new factor in the lives of our local suppliers, and it has to be addressed carefully by retailers and wholesalers so that both remain viable. Our particular concern is to avoid any prejudice to the work of New Zealand authors. Like Laura, we’re not entirely sure how it’s going to pan out, but one of the many questions in the international debate concerns the future of territorial rights (versus global rights). New Zealand is a very small player in this, and the outcome will depend greatly on what American and British publishers do.

Tilly Lloyd, Alan Preston, Heather McKenzie and Carolyn Alexander
Unity Books, Wellington

 

Wrong category

I have had drawn to my attention recently a rather curious review of one of my historical novels – The Dancing Man – which appeared in your March 1998 issue. In writing thus I am breaking the professional habit of a lifetime of not replying to critics – either musical or literary – but I do so now because of your reviewer’s basic error in categorising my novel as a murder mystery. The novel is not a murder mystery, was never intended to be, and has not been advertised as one as far as I know. There is not even, strictly speaking, a murder in it! It is a straightforward historical novel which happens to have a police detective as its central character.

If critics feel they must categorize the books they discuss they have an obligation to at least attempt to understand what they read. Bernard Carpinter has managed to both misread and misunderstand not only my book but also Ray Prebble’s Click in order to pursue some fanciful and jejune theory about Christchurch and its writers. Why he should be so anxious to do so is beyond my comprehension. Did he not notice that Ray Prebble is, in fact, a Wellingtonian?

Edmund Bohan
Christchurch

 

What universities are for

I was pleased to read Professor Peter Munz’s Comment on the intrinsic difference between the kind of education offered at a university and a polytechnic (October issue).

I only hope that the Minister of Education, the Hon Mr Wyatt Creech, has been given an opportunity “to read, mark, learn and inwardly digest” Professor Munz’s analysis, and that after due consideration he will embrace the idea that tertiary education consists of more than the acquisition of skills.

R S V Simpson
Wellington

Tagged with:
Posted in Letters
Search the archive
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Architecture
Art
Autobiography
Awards
Biography
Byline
Children
Comment
Contents
ebooks
Economics
Editorial
Education
Essays
Extract
Fiction
Gender
Graphic novel
Health
History
Imprints
Language
Lecture
Letters
Letters
Literature
Māori
Media
Memoir
Music
Natural History
Non-fiction
Obituaries
Opinion
Pacific
Photography
Plays
Poem
Poetry
Politics & Law
Psychology
Religion
Review
Science
Short stories
Sociology
Sport
Subscribers only
War
YA Reviewers
Young adults
Recent issues: subscriber-only access

Subscribe to NZ Books to access the issues above

Search by category

See more